Pandemics are increasingly used to explain historical transformations, but pandemics alone do not inevitably lead to drastic change. As the ongoing COVID pandemic has made all too clear, the impact of a pandemic is a result of a dynamic interaction between human societies and the environments they occupy. This talk will explore the ways in which historical pandemics have been used in public discussions and debates during the first year of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Historical approaches can be grouped into roughly two types: lessons from the past to understand and mitigate the spread of the virus and attempts to forecast what might come next. Using the case studies of the Justinianic Plague (c. 540–750 CE) and the 1918 Influenza Pandemic, this talk reflects upon these two types of debates over the last year. It will demonstrate how these approaches have flattened historical pandemics into a single model, while at the same time offering false hope for the future. It then suggests that due in part to this problematic historical approach we have failed to grapple with daily life during pandemics, assumed our present superiority, and aimed for resilience without acknowledging that resilience alone cannot transform existing problematic societal structures. At the end, I offer suggestions for how a human-centered approach to the study of historical pandemics may lead to better outcomes.
Presenters
Merle Eisenberg
Dr. Merle Eisenberg is an Assistant Professor at Oklahoma State University and a late antique, medieval, and environmental historian. He researches the impact of the great moments of historical crisis that divide antiquity and the Middle Ages—from the fall of the Roman Empire to the first plague pandemic. At SESYNC, his project was entitled The Making of a Pandemic: Plague, Environment, and the End of Antiquity. It examined the outbreak of the first great socio-ecological disaster in recorded human history—the first bubonic plague pandemic, commonly known as the Justinianic Plague (c. 541-750...
Merle Eisenberg
Dr. Merle Eisenberg is an Assistant Professor at Oklahoma State University and a late antique, medieval, and environmental historian. He researches the impact of the great moments of historical crisis that divide antiquity and the Middle Ages—from the fall of the Roman Empire to the first plague pandemic. At SESYNC, his project was entitled The Making of a Pandemic: Plague, Environment, and the End of Antiquity. It examined the outbreak of the first great socio-ecological disaster in recorded human history—the first bubonic plague pandemic, commonly known as the Justinianic Plague (c. 541-750 CE). The Making of a Pandemic investigated various types of evidence—written sources; archaeological, environmental, numismatic (coinage) and epigraphic (inscriptions) sources; and even ancient DNA—to answer questions about the plague outbreak. His project examined how the disease emerged, how it spread, where it lingered or disappeared, and what rate of mortality it caused. Merle has published the results of his project in leading science journals, such as The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and history journals such as The American Historical Review and Past & Present. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Merle also engaged in public scholarship, with efforts such as writing an op-ed in the Washington Post, appearing on CNN International, and co-hosting a podcast with former SESYNC postdoc Lee Mordechai on disease outbreaks in history, Infectious Historians. Merle received his PhD in history from Princeton University, his master’s degree from King’s College London, and his bachelor’s degree from Colby College.
External Links:
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2QVwexEAAAAJ&hl=en